| Latest News: | ||
|
||
|
Just as stated below on the previous news, the 1.2 release is all about jboss support and some future ESB work. The ESB work is tucked away for a future release, but should anyone feel curious, that what open source is all about. Take a look! |
||
|
|
||
|
||
What is DropboxMQ? |
||
How well does your JMS recover?Here is the scenario: You have a JMS application that reads a message, does some work, stores something in a database, and finally sends a reply message. Say the database crashed about two hours ago and the application has burned through hundreds of messages, erroring out on each message. So you fix the database and everything is running fine again. But how do you recover all of those lost messages? The answer depends largely on which JMS provider you use. With DropboxMQ, you simply
|
||
|
||
|
|
||
|
||
| Previous News: | ||
|
||
|
Only a handful of minor fixes in this release. The main fix was to resolve contention when running on NFS in a clustered or any multiple consumer and multiple server environment. Consumed messages will now have the client id prepended to the message filename to avoid NFS reporting more than one successful consumer. It seems to be working in our production environment, so give it a try and let us know how it goes. Up next: Some minor fixes for jboss (but most likely applicable to all app servers except OAS). We have also been looking at some fun ESB functionality. |
||
|
||
|
The functionality is 100% there and this release has been in production at my day job for several months now. Sorry for holding it back but life has its demands. Not a lot changed between 0.9 and 1.0. Looking at README.txt nothing really stands out. |
||
|
||
|
Only a very few (all minor) issues need to be addressed before we get to 1.0. Here are the release notes for 0.9:
|
||
|
||
|
Looking at previous posts, XA is still at 90%, JCA is still nearly complete and message selectors still don't support LIKE, but much progress has still been made. Hopefully we can avoid having the last 10% taking 90% of the time. What is in this release is a much more correct JCA and a very solid core. There have been a couple of interim builds that were not widely published. 0.7 is in production currently at my day job and this 0.8 release is slated to go in mid-October. |
||
|
||
|
This is an interim build to tag a release that will be going into production at my day job. There has been
considerable work since 0.4 but unfortunately none of it is 100%. The most egregious bug is in
I obviously haven't been twiddling my thumbs but it hard to believe that it's been over a 1 1/2 years since the last release. 0.6 should be just a few days past 0.5. 1.0 will happen when all of the issues mentioned above are 100% which feels very close. |
||
|
||
|
Until now dropboxes were typically used in a point-to-point messaging domain. DropboxMQ 0.4 changes that while maintaining the same basic architecture of previous versions. We have also added some administrative tools and freshened up the documentation. I'm thinking the next release will contain support for distributed transactions which sounds much more interesting than message selectors. Enjoy and let me know what you think. |
||
|
||
|
The primary goal of this release was to tie up loose ends and greatly reduce the number of filtered-out
JMSCTS tests. The basic architecture remains unchanged but we now support all JMS message types and the
Onward to pub-sub! |
||
|
||
|
DropboxMQ is now in full compliance with all JMSCTS point-to-point tests. The exact list of filtered out tests can be seen here. Now the prioritized list of new features is as follows:
|
||
|
||
|
DropboxMQ is far from complete, but it is already functional with several JMS applications. This release only supports point-to-point message model (pub/sub will be supported in a later release). |
||
|