Not entirely sure what this is but it's definitely something interactive and interesting

Mathematics

Articles/Blogs/Essays/Tweet threads

Reading

Mathematics For Computer Science

Philosophy

General

Individuals

Software

Psychology

Language

Fallacies

"Characteristics of Pseudoscience" (graphic):

  1. Is UNFALSIFIABLE (can't be proven wrong); makes vague or unobservable claims.
  2. Relies heavily on ANECDOTES, personal experiences, and testimonials.
  3. CHERRY PICKS confirming evidence while ignoring/minimizing disconfirming evidence.
  4. Uses TECHNOBABBLE: words that sound scientific but don't make sense.
  5. Lacks PLAUSIBLE MECHANISM: No way to explain it based on existing knowledge.
  6. Is UNCHANGING: Doesn't self-correct or progress.
  7. Makes EXTRAORDINARY/EXAGGERATED CLAIMS with insufficient evidence.
  8. Professes CERTAINTY: Talks of "proof" with great confidence.
  9. Commits LOGICAL FALLACIES: Arguments contain errors in reasoning.
  10. Lacks PEER REVIEW: Goes directly to the public, avoiding scientific scrutiny.
  11. Claims there's a CONSPIRACY to suppress their ideas.

"It was safer back in my day" takedown: "The findings ... suggest there is a pervasive illusion of moral decline that is the result, at least in part, of two common psychological biases." ... "Mastroianni also noted that a study published last year, which analyzed 511 studies conducted over the course of 61 years, found evidence that cooperative behavior had actually increased over time." -- Study: "The illusion of moral decline"

Random shit that I find interesting but not high priority


Detail Pages:

Last modified 17 October 2025